Archive

February 11, 2025

Browsing

The market rebounded to start trading on Monday, but indicators on Friday suggest internal weakness. Carl gives us his latest analysis on the market as well as taking a look at Gold which is making more all-time highs. Get Carl’s perspective on the Gold rally.

Besides looking at the market, Carl walked us through the DP Signal Tables and took a look at the Dollar, Gold, Crude Oil, Bonds, Yields, Gold Miners and Bitcoin.

Once he finished with his market review, Carl walked us through the daily and weekly charts of the Magnificent Seven which have mixed reviews on future price action.

Erin took the reins and analyzed sector rotation, concentrating on Energy, Technology and Utilities. She took a look under the hood to see if today’s rallies will catch on or not based on internal participation.

Symbol requests finished out the trading room with looks at various symbols of interest. Erin walked us through the daily and weekly charts with a few looks at 5-minute candlestick charts to time entries and exits.

Join us in the free trading room live to have your symbols reviewed and analyzed by registering ONCE at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_D6iAp-C1S6SebVpQIYcC6g

We are also running a free two week trial of any of our reports. Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 at checkout!

01:06 DP Signal Tables

07:35 Market Analysis

20:37 Magnificent Seven

28:05 Sector Rotation

35:51 Symbol Requests


The DP Alert: Your First Stop to a Great Trade!

Before you trade any stock or ETF, you need to know the trend and condition of the market. The DP Alert gives you all you need to know with an executive summary of the market’s current trend and condition. It not only covers the market! We look at Bitcoin, Yields, Bonds, Gold, the Dollar, Gold Miners and Crude Oil! Only $50/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!


Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:


Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2025 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


Have you ever held on too long to a winning position? You watch as that former top performer in your portfolio slows down, and then rotates lower, and then really begins to deteriorate, and you just watch it all happen without taking action?

If the answer is “yes”, then you have fallen victim to one of the more frustrating of the behavioral biases called “endowment bias”. Basically, we feel unable to let go of this position because of our emotional attachment, and we hold on to a losing position despite very clear technical signs that we should do otherwise!

Today I’ll share three technical analysis techniques that I’ve found helpful to cut my losses, minimize the crippling impact of endowment bias, and preserve my portfolio through challenging periods.

When in Doubt, Follow the Trend

The biggest issue I find when it comes to endowment bias is that investors simply ignore clear signs on the chart. As my mentor Ralph Acampora once told me, “Analyzing the chart is the easy part. Actually doing what the chart tells you? That’s the tough part!”

The chart of Intel Corp. (INTC) in early 2024 shows how a stock can rotate from a period of accumulation to a period of distribution. In late 2023, INTC was making higher highs and higher lows, the price above two upward-sloping moving averages. The RSI was mostly above the 40 level, representing a bullish range for this momentum indicator. The relative strength (bottom panel) was steadily trending higher, demonstrating that INTC was outperforming the S&P 500.

By April of 2024, literally all of the previous bullet points had changed from bullish to bearish. INTC was now breaking down through moving average support, the moving averages were beginning to slope lower, and the RSI had moved to a bearish range below 60.

Think of technical indicators like a checklist, and go through the process of evaluating each indicator on the chart to determine whether the current reading is bullish or bearish. And when you get to a point when the bearish evidence outweighs in the bullish, then move on to better opportunities!

Relative Strength Can Bring Additional Clarity

Sometimes a stock will stop going higher, but instead of breaking down it enters a new consolidation phase. Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) showed this particular phenomenon in 2024, as it entered a trading range between $400 and $460 after a new all-time high in July.

Now even though the price trend was now sideways, note how the relative strength line began to trend steadily lower. This pattern emerged because MSFT was holding support, so the price trend was still in decent shape, but other stocks were continuing to pound out a strong second half to 2024.

When you’re holding a stock with deteriorating relative strength, your “opportunity cost alarm” should be going off big time. Basically, while you’re not necessarily losing money holding this particular stock, there are other stocks out there that are still moving higher. So by tying up your capital in this particular stock, you’re missing out on other opportunities to outperform!

Institutional investors tend to be laser-focused on relative strength, as that is pretty much exactly how they are evaluated as active managers. So think like an institutional investor, and if your charts begin to feature weakening relative strength, look around for other places to outperform.

Divergences are Often an Early Warning Signal

Parts of the technical toolkit can be used more as leading indicators than lagging indicators. I’ve found bearish momentum divergences to provide excellent early warning signals, because they will raise a red flag while the primary uptrend is still in place.

The chart of Synchrony Financial (SYF) still appears in decent shape, with a pattern of higher highs and higher lows continuing through early 2025. But notice how the RSI has actually been making lower peaks since early November, despite the stronger price action?

SYF and similar names will usually find a place on my “potential topping patterns” ChartList, helping me focus on charts that are still going higher yet demonstrating similar characteristics to previous market tops. I’m happy to still own a chart like SYF as long as the price keeps showing strength, but the bearish divergence tells me to be ready to take profits if the impending drop becomes a reality.

Mindless investors ignore clear signs of price deterioration because endowment bias prevents them from admitting a change in the technical evidence. Mindful investors, however, have a consistent process for evaluating their holdings, and are more easily able to admit when a chart is no longer helping them achieve their portfolio goals.

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!


David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Here’s a recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (February 10) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

Bitcoin and Ethereum price update

Bitcoin is trading at US$97,304, reflecting a 1.1 percent increase over the past 24 hours.

The day’s trading range has reached a high of US$97,896 and a low of US$96,882.

Meanwhile, Ethereum is priced at US$2,679.41, up 1.6 percent over the same period. The cryptocurrency reached an intraday high of US$2,689 and a low of US$2,645.

Altcoin price update

  • Solana (SOL) is currently valued at US$200.82, marking a 0.6 percent increase over the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency hit a daily high of US$207.25 and a low of US$201.15.
  • XRP is at US$2.43, up 0.8 percent. It reached an intraday high of US$2.45 and a low of US$2.41.
  • Sui (SUI) is trading at US$3.24, up 5.6 percent. It achieved a daily high of US$3.28 and a low of US$3.23.
  • Cardano (ADA) is priced at US$0.7045, reflecting a 3.3 percent increase over 24 hours. Its highest price on Monday was US$0.7104 and its lowest was US$0.6969.

Crypto news to know

Japan-based Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet (OTCQX:MTPLF,TSE:3350) released its full-year 2024 earnings on Monday, revealing roughly US$36 million in unrealized gains from the purchase of 1,761 Bitcoin.

The company said it acquired the coins for roughly US$137 million.

Metaplanet’s shareholder base grew by 500 percent last year, primarily due to the issuance of new shares to fund its Bitcoin acquisition strategy. This growth was facilitated by both debt and equity financing.

Metaplanet said it will increase its Bitcoin holdings to 10,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2025, and 21,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2026. The company’s shares closed up 17.37 percent on Monday afternoon.

CoinShares data shows Ether exchange-traded product (ETPs) inflows outpaced inflows to Bitcoin ETPs during last week’s market decline. Ether ETPs recorded US$793 million in inflows, 95 percent more than Bitcoin’s recorded inflows of US$407 million. Total year-to-date inflows to digital asset investment products have reached US$7.3 billion.

According to CoinShares’ James Butterfill, last week’s price fall resulted in significant buying on weakness.

Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) resumed buying Bitcoin last week, acquiring 7,633 Bitcoin for approximately US$742.4 million in cash at an average price of roughly US$97,255 per coin, as per US Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Strategy’s Michael Saylor hinted at another impending Bitcoin acquisition on Sunday (February 9) morning, posting a screenshot of the Saylor Tracker, a tool that monitors and tracks Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings.

“Death to the blue lines. Long live the green dots,’ he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Market watchers have come to recognize these posts as indicators of the company’s upcoming Bitcoin purchases.

Meanwhile, fraud allegations have resulted in a rapid pullback for $CAR, a meme coin launched on Sunday by the Central African Republic. President Faustin-Archange Touadera described the coin as an ‘experiment’ to raise the country’s global profile and showcase how a meme-based token can support national development.

However, shortly after $CAR’s launch, the coin’s X account was suspended, and allegations of fraud soon surfaced, with deepfake checker tool Deepware flagging a video statement from Touadera as suspicious. The news has caused $CAR’s price to pull back over 92 percent, from US$0.79 to US$0.05 as of Monday afternoon.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Gold has long served as a tool for investors to enhance their portfolios and protect against volatility.

At the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference, CEO Jay Martin engaged with industry experts Frank Giustra, Grant Williams, Alastair Still and David Garofalo to explore trends currently affecting the sector.

The group illustrated a market at a crucial juncture, with changing investor sentiment, geopolitical tensions and impending financial instability converging to potentially create the perfect storm.

Eastern vs. western perspectives on gold

Martin kicked the panel off by reviewing the last several years in the gold market. Looking back at 2019 and 2020, he noted that an influx of western investors helped pushed the metal’s price to phenomenal levels.

However, as the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic drove inflation and interest rates, these investors became sellers, and gold started to sink. Capitalizing on these lower price points, central banks moved into the market and not only stabilized the price, but caused it to surge to all-time highs. By mid-2024, gold was 70 percent above its 2022 low.

Frank Giustra, CEO of the Fiore Group, largely agreed with Martin’s summary of gold’s activity, but added that while he thinks central bank buying will continue, there is more going on than meets the eye.

“What most people don’t understand about gold is that it’s not that the gold price is going up — it’s the fact that the fiat currencies that are measured against it are going down in value for a whole host of reasons,’ he said.

Giustra sees the US fiscal situation as a factor pushing the gold price up, and suggested that the situation is not only beyond repair, but also on the precipice of a crisis. “At some point there will be a US dollar crisis. It’s going to happen in our lifetimes, probably sooner rather than later, and when that happens, gold will go through the roof,’ he noted.

Grant Williams, author at Things That Make You Go Hmmm, expanded on Giustra’s point, outlining a critical difference between the east and west. “In the east, people don’t buy gold to sell it because the price has gone up. They buy gold to own it, and when they do sell it, it’s because they need to raise money for something important,” he said.

Williams also suggested that the west is at the end of a cycle. In his view, investors are attempting to maximize their returns in any way possible, and the system is corrupt and lacks consequences.

“This is going to come to a head. We’re in the middle of that process now, and at the end of that process, when these cycles fall over, the one thing you want to own is gold,’ he explained at the conference.

‘We are moving into the part of this where it’s not just a good idea to own gold anymore — it’s essential to own gold. And I think the price is going to reflect that in the coming 12 to 18 months.’

Tech stocks, Bitcoin distracting investors from gold

The panelists agreed that today’s investors are distracted as tech and Bitcoin dominate headlines.

While technology stocks still follow the typical market ebbs and flows, cryptocurrencies are a different story.

Giustra even compared the crypto space to a Ponzi scheme, pointing to one influential commenter who has suggested that Bitcoin will reach a value of US$13 million and gold will reach zero.

“These are ridiculous statements, but he needs to make those kinds of statements to keep the greed factor going. In any pyramid scheme, you need to have new buyers all the time to keep the game going,” he said.

Giustra also outlined how the cryptocurrency space has influenced the recent US election, spending US$245 million to influence Congress and the incoming president to ease regulations. This comes from a shifting narrative that implies crypto is a store of value. Giustra believes it’s an asset class in search of a purpose.

GoldMining (TSX:GOLD,NYSEAMERICAN:GLDG) CEO Alastair Still backed Giustra, saying that unlike gold, Bitcoins can be created every day, while gold’s limited supply is inherently connected to its store of value.

Still described how resource scarcity has been tested, outlining how geopolitically stable jurisdictions are diminishing. At the same time, mining companies have underinvested in exploration and been slow to find new assets.

“So while I think many investors are a little behind the curve,’ he explained at VRIC.

‘What we have seen is the major operating companies, they’re running deficits in their reserves, so they’re not replacing what they’re mining, and that’s because they’ve been underfunding exploration for years.’

Gold majors dealing with low grades, declining reserves

The systemic underfunding of exploration could be an opportunity for explorers and developers to start acquiring projects that will be sought by majors in the future. As it stands, miners are having to maximize extraction efforts.

“The operators are mining lower grades. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re making more gold. They might make more profit, but they are actually potentially mining less gold,” Still commented.

David Garofalo, CEO, president, chairman and director at Gold Royalty (NYSEAMERICAN:GROY), agreed that operators are facing a challenge. “They’re facing a squeeze from tiny reserves, and reserves are down 40 percent. That’s demonstrated because the juniors haven’t had access to capital for over a dozen years,” he said.

He went on to explain that the entire industry is facing cost pressures.

All-in-sustaining costs have risen along with the price of gold, leading to a squeeze among producers. Much of this is due to inflation, which has resonated throughout the general economy.

“That’s why when you look at the leaders in our industry, their share prices are lower today than they were 30 years ago, when the gold price was a 10th of what it is today,” Garofalo said.

Rising costs and chronic underfunding are causing a dual squeeze. No new projects are in the pipeline, and he doesn’t expect the situation to reverse any time soon. Instead, he sees sees major companies like Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX,NYSE:GOLD) and Newmont (TSX:NGT,NYSE:NEM) with stagnating reserves and stalled output.

They can grow their share count, but not the gold they have access to, they’re not creating share value.

Which gold stocks to focus on now?

Garofalo suggested that the right space to be in now is the development stage. He thinks the majors are approaching a point where they need to add assets to their portfolios to continue to grow.

“The industry has basically been giving money back to investors for the last dozen years in dividends and share buybacks and whatnot, and not meaningfully back into the grassroots exploration to replace depleting reserves,” he said.

Likewise, Giustra backed the idea that the gold sector needs more consolidation.

“There are far too many companies burning a lot of overhead. The industry needs to consolidate. We need to deliver performance. And so it’s partially the industry’s fault; for a long time, it hasn’t performed. You need to perform economically with your deposits to qualify as an investment sector,” he said.

Williams added that it’s important for investors to understand what they are looking for. He said that gold can be “a get rich quick scheme, a get rich slow scheme and a stay rich scheme,” depending on where you are in the cycle.

“That shouldn’t be your only focus. You shouldn’t only be thinking about, ‘Where can I find the 10 baggers?’ If that’s really your mindset, crypto is the perfect vehicle for that, because there’s a 10 bagger produced every minute if you’re lucky enough to get in and get out. This industry is tangible,’ Williams said.

‘It’s things you pull out of the ground that are valuable.’

Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

TSMC has seen a slowdown in its sales growth this January. The company now faces global challenges that have reduced demand. Many factors play a part in this change, and the shift has caught many by surprise.

First, global economic troubles have affected many buyers. They are cautious and delay purchases. In addition, issues with the supply chain have forced TSMC to make production changes. Moreover, rising costs have put extra pressure on the business.

Second, market conditions have shifted quickly. Many customers now wait before buying new chips. For example, uncertainty in other parts of the world has led to lower orders. As a result, TSMC has seen slower growth than before.

Furthermore, industry experts say that even top companies face hard times. They believe that careful planning and quick action can help. Therefore, TSMC is reviewing its strategies and planning new investments. In turn, these moves may boost future sales.

Additionally, the company plans to invest in newer technology. This step can help lower costs and improve production. Consequently, TSMC may be able to overcome current troubles and return to strong growth.

In conclusion, the slowdown in TSMC sales growth is a sign of wider market problems. However, the company remains strong and capable. With smart decisions and timely investments, TSMC can meet these challenges. Thus, both investors and customers look forward to a rebound.

Overall, TSMC continues to lead in the semiconductor industry. Yet, global problems have slowed its pace for now. By adapting to change and using new strategies, the company is set to regain momentum. Finally, time will show if these efforts bring a quick recovery.

Conclusion

Looking ahead, TSMC must remain agile. The company will work to cut extra costs and boost efficiency. It will also seek new markets and form strong partnerships. These measures will help secure its future. In short, the firm is ready to face upcoming challenges.

The post TSMC Sales Growth Slows Amid Global Challenges appeared first on FinanceBrokerage.

McDonald’s on Monday reported disappointing quarterly revenue, dragged down by weaker-than-expected sales at its U.S. restaurants following an E. coli outbreak just weeks into the quarter.

But shares of the company rose more than 4% in morning trading as executives predicted sales would improve in 2025.

Here’s what the company reported compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

Net sales of $6.39 billion were roughly flat compared with the year-ago period. The company’s overall same-store sales growth of 0.4% outperformed Wall Street’s expectations of same-store sales declines of 1%, according to StreetAccount estimates.

But McDonald’s U.S. business reported a steeper-than-expected drop in its same-store sales. Same-store sales at the company’s domestic restaurants fell 1.4% in the quarter; Wall Street was projecting same-store sales declines of 0.6%.

McDonald’s said traffic was slightly positive, but customers spent less than usual during the quarter. Over the summer, the chain rolled out a $5 combo meal to bring back price-conscious diners and reverse sluggish sales. The strategy worked, helping McDonald’s U.S. same-store sales tick up in the third quarter.

However, analysts have warned that value meals only work if customers also add menu items that aren’t discounted to their orders. McDonald’s executives downplayed those concerns Monday, saying the average check on the $5 meal deal is more than $10.

The biggest hit to McDonald’s U.S. sales came in late October, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention linked a fatal E. coli outbreak to its Quarter Pounder burgers. McDonald’s switched suppliers for its slivered onions, the ingredient fingered as the likely culprit for the outbreak. In early December, the CDC declared the outbreak officially over.

However, in the days following the news of the outbreak, traffic at McDonald’s U.S. restaurants fell steeply, particularly in the states affected.

U.S. sales hit their nadir in early November, but began rising again after that. In particular, demand for the Quarter Pounder, a popular core menu item with high margins, fell quickly in the wake of the crisis.

McDonald’s expects its U.S. sales to recover by the beginning of the second quarter, executives said.

“I think right now what we’re seeing is that the E. coli impact is now just localized to the areas that had the biggest impact,” CEO Chris Kempczinski said on the company’s conference call. “So think about that as sort of the Rocky Mountain region that was really the epicenter of the issue.”

The company hopes value deals, along with key menu additions, will help to fuel the recovery this year. In 2025, the burger chain plans to bring back its popular snack wraps, which vanished from menus during pandemic lockdowns, and to introduce a new chicken strip menu item.

Outside the U.S., sales were stronger. Both of McDonald’s international divisions reported same-store sales increases, bolstering the company’s overall performance.

The company’s international developmental licensed markets segment, which includes the Middle East and Japan, reported same-store sales growth of 4.1%.

McDonald’s international operated markets division, which includes some of its biggest markets, reported same-store sales growth of 0.1%. The company said most markets reported same-store sales increases, but the United Kingdom and some other markets saw same-store sales shrink in the quarter. One bright spot was France, which saw its same-store sales turn positive during the quarter after months of weak demand.

McDonald’s reported fourth-quarter net income of $2.02 billion, or $2.80 per share, down from $2.04 billion, or $2.80 per share, a year earlier.

Excluding gains tied to the sale of its South Korean business, transaction costs for buying its Israeli franchise and other items, McDonald’s earned $2.83 per share.

Looking to 2025, the first quarter is expected to be the low point for McDonald’s same-store sales, CFO Ian Borden said, citing a weak start to the year in the U.S., among other factors. Winter storms and wildfires in California weighed on restaurant traffic across the industry in January.

For the full year, McDonald’s plans to open roughly 2,200 restaurants. About a quarter of those locations will be in the U.S. and its international operated markets. The rest will be in the company’s international developmental licensed markets, including about 1,000 new restaurants in China.

Including its investments in restaurant openings, McDonald’s plans to spend between $3 billion and $3.2 billion this year on capital expenditures.

The company is also projecting a headwind of 20 cents to 30 cents per share to its full-year earnings due to foreign currency exchange rates.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

McDonald’s on Monday reported disappointing quarterly revenue, dragged down by weaker-than-expected sales at its U.S. restaurants following an E. coli outbreak just weeks into the quarter.

But shares of the company rose more than 4% in morning trading as executives predicted sales would improve in 2025.

Here’s what the company reported compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

Net sales of $6.39 billion were roughly flat compared with the year-ago period. The company’s overall same-store sales growth of 0.4% outperformed Wall Street’s expectations of same-store sales declines of 1%, according to StreetAccount estimates.

But McDonald’s U.S. business reported a steeper-than-expected drop in its same-store sales. Same-store sales at the company’s domestic restaurants fell 1.4% in the quarter; Wall Street was projecting same-store sales declines of 0.6%.

McDonald’s said traffic was slightly positive, but customers spent less than usual during the quarter. Over the summer, the chain rolled out a $5 combo meal to bring back price-conscious diners and reverse sluggish sales. The strategy worked, helping McDonald’s U.S. same-store sales tick up in the third quarter.

However, analysts have warned that value meals only work if customers also add menu items that aren’t discounted to their orders. McDonald’s executives downplayed those concerns Monday, saying the average check on the $5 meal deal is more than $10.

The biggest hit to McDonald’s U.S. sales came in late October, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention linked a fatal E. coli outbreak to its Quarter Pounder burgers. McDonald’s switched suppliers for its slivered onions, the ingredient fingered as the likely culprit for the outbreak. In early December, the CDC declared the outbreak officially over.

However, in the days following the news of the outbreak, traffic at McDonald’s U.S. restaurants fell steeply, particularly in the states affected.

U.S. sales hit their nadir in early November, but began rising again after that. In particular, demand for the Quarter Pounder, a popular core menu item with high margins, fell quickly in the wake of the crisis.

McDonald’s expects its U.S. sales to recover by the beginning of the second quarter, executives said.

“I think right now what we’re seeing is that the E. coli impact is now just localized to the areas that had the biggest impact,” CEO Chris Kempczinski said on the company’s conference call. “So think about that as sort of the Rocky Mountain region that was really the epicenter of the issue.”

The company hopes value deals, along with key menu additions, will help to fuel the recovery this year. In 2025, the burger chain plans to bring back its popular snack wraps, which vanished from menus during pandemic lockdowns, and to introduce a new chicken strip menu item.

Outside the U.S., sales were stronger. Both of McDonald’s international divisions reported same-store sales increases, bolstering the company’s overall performance.

The company’s international developmental licensed markets segment, which includes the Middle East and Japan, reported same-store sales growth of 4.1%.

McDonald’s international operated markets division, which includes some of its biggest markets, reported same-store sales growth of 0.1%. The company said most markets reported same-store sales increases, but the United Kingdom and some other markets saw same-store sales shrink in the quarter. One bright spot was France, which saw its same-store sales turn positive during the quarter after months of weak demand.

McDonald’s reported fourth-quarter net income of $2.02 billion, or $2.80 per share, down from $2.04 billion, or $2.80 per share, a year earlier.

Excluding gains tied to the sale of its South Korean business, transaction costs for buying its Israeli franchise and other items, McDonald’s earned $2.83 per share.

Looking to 2025, the first quarter is expected to be the low point for McDonald’s same-store sales, CFO Ian Borden said, citing a weak start to the year in the U.S., among other factors. Winter storms and wildfires in California weighed on restaurant traffic across the industry in January.

For the full year, McDonald’s plans to open roughly 2,200 restaurants. About a quarter of those locations will be in the U.S. and its international operated markets. The rest will be in the company’s international developmental licensed markets, including about 1,000 new restaurants in China.

Including its investments in restaurant openings, McDonald’s plans to spend between $3 billion and $3.2 billion this year on capital expenditures.

The company is also projecting a headwind of 20 cents to 30 cents per share to its full-year earnings due to foreign currency exchange rates.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS